foolsguinea (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
foolsguinea) wrote2010-10-31 12:25 pm
foolsguinea) wrote2010-10-31 12:25 pm
Entry tags:
rant of the day -- well, morning anyway
Funny thing is, I don't particularly care about earnings taxes or real estate transfer taxes. But Prop. A & Amendm't 3 (Missouri) are shortsighted. It's the combination of attempting to prevent such taxes from being passed in the future, & grabbing power away from localities, that makes me rabidly opposed to these propositions.
Amendm't 1, otoh, is completely ridiculous. If you have to make a targeted exception to the rule you're putting in the constitution, why are you putting it in the constitution?
And if a tax break for POW's were a statute, I wouldn't object. In fact, I don't really care if this one passes, because it's hilarious. But it's still too goofy for me to really advocate it for the constitution.
Amendm't 1, otoh, is completely ridiculous. If you have to make a targeted exception to the rule you're putting in the constitution, why are you putting it in the constitution?
And if a tax break for POW's were a statute, I wouldn't object. In fact, I don't really care if this one passes, because it's hilarious. But it's still too goofy for me to really advocate it for the constitution.