Who's on your side?
Dec. 5th, 2011 01:55 amhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/opinion/sunday/dowd-out-of-africa-and-into-iowa.htm
Maureen Dowd is not favorably impressed by Newt Gingrich. She says he's not as smart as he thinks he is. The line I find really interesting is this:
"Gingrich, a radical precursor to the modern Tea Party when he staged what conservatives considered the second American Revolution in the House in the ’90s...."
Is that what that was? Because if we're calling that a revolution, surely it was a mere counterrevolution to the New Deal, itself following a revolutionary war for workers' rights:
"They say in Harlan County there are no neutrals there."
--
I went looking for a vid of "Which Side Are You On?" and I found this one I'd missed before, from last December. Note that this is from before the Occupy Wall Street General Assembly got started this fall.
--
This following is from "Zeriel" on the Straight Dope MB:
Maureen Dowd is not favorably impressed by Newt Gingrich. She says he's not as smart as he thinks he is. The line I find really interesting is this:
"Gingrich, a radical precursor to the modern Tea Party when he staged what conservatives considered the second American Revolution in the House in the ’90s...."
Is that what that was? Because if we're calling that a revolution, surely it was a mere counterrevolution to the New Deal, itself following a revolutionary war for workers' rights:
"They say in Harlan County there are no neutrals there."
--
I went looking for a vid of "Which Side Are You On?" and I found this one I'd missed before, from last December. Note that this is from before the Occupy Wall Street General Assembly got started this fall.
--
This following is from "Zeriel" on the Straight Dope MB:
I'll happily note [a professional trader] knows more about the technical aspects of some portions of financial trading. That doesn't make his analysis of the global situation or the crash timeline any more correct--as I said, this last little lecture series is pretty much just cementing my opinion of the idiocy of the people making these decisions. To me it's dead simple--it's morally equivalent to a family man maxing out his credit card at the casino because he's won a few times at the craps table and thinks he has a system.
--
I talk about my dad a lot in these discussions. Smart guy, but all horse sense. Decided that being a general store owner was his dream when he was a kid, did eight years in the Navy and two 'Nam tours to get the cash up, never asked anyone for a loan until he bought a house with 50% down, never carried a balance on his credit cards.
He's doing pretty well, has a house and a business and two cars completely paid off, owes no money to nobody.
He owns the only place to get groceries, fresh meat, and produce within 15 miles, in a poor Appalachia community where most everyone is on some kind of assistance.
If working hard at shitty jobs that are essential to the community paid as well as I keep hearing it does, he'd be Warren Buffet.
Instead he's busting his ass at 80-hour-weeks while in his 60s, and he's going to be doing it until he dies because his stock portfolios got killed twice in the last decade or so, mainly due to stupid decisions being made by people who make more money in a year than he's ever seen in his life (otherwise known as "market risk").
I've never know him to vote for a non-Republican (his truck STILL has a "Don't blame me, I voted Republican!" bumper sticker) but he's a supporter of OWS nowadays. THAT, more than anything else, should scare the hell out of some people.